Archive for the ‘Health’ Category

Trusting the Research

Thursday, March 16th, 2017

This past year, City Council meetings in my hometown regarding the hazards/benefits of having fluoridated water was interesting beyond the obvious level of polarization that it created.  If you were trying to be totally objective in weighing the pros and cons, you had to be impressed with the level of knowledge and research presented.  I was struck by the fact that most of the best research was shared by ordinary citizens rather than health professionals.

It occurred to me that the anti-fluoride side was much better prepared in presenting actual facts and figures about the problems with adding fluoride to municipal water systems, while the professionals seemed to expect that people should agree with them just because they had a title or credentials. Today, in the age of the internet, everyone has access to Pub Med, the service that supplies published research to anyone with a computer.  In other words, we all have access to the truth if we can type in a few search words.

Personally, I spend a lot of time on Pub Med.  Did you know that there are over 20,000 peer-reviewed research papers published each year?  Keeping up on all of the information is impossible for any one person, even if you spent all of your free time reading the available data.  That is why I am always amused when another health professional tell me that there is no research to validate a statement that I have made.  I just ask them if they have reviewed all of the 20,000 articles that were published in the past year. End of discussion.

The real issue is this—Can you trust the results of the research?  After all, somebody had to write a check to pay for the study that was published, since most researchers do not work for free.  Can the results of the research be tainted by the special interests of the industry that is funding the research?  Of course it can!  It happens more often than the general public will ever be allowed to know.  Therefore, looking at the source of the funding is paramount.

Approximately 2/3rds of the research is funded by two industries, the chemical industry and the pharmaceutical industry.  Many of the research projects that are started are never finished.  The funding is pulled if the data implies that completion of the study may possibly work against the industry that is paying the bills.  That information is then swept under the carpet and the public will never learn why the data was destroyed.  This is particularly evident in the chemical industry, where GMO (genetically modified organism) research is often started but never completed.

Personally, I prefer to read the purer research studies published by the computer industry, for two reasons.  First, they are only interested in the truth about how to create the next level of technology.  They have nothing to hide from the public about studies that go horribly wrong.  Secondly, they tend to model future computer technology after new research that studies the functions of the human brain.  Computers have always been designed with that idea in mind.

The latest peer-reviewed research suggests that human memory is not held in the brain, or even in the body.  It is held in the field of energy that surrounds the body.  The brain, the neurons and the dendrites act as antennae to read the information coming in from the field as a person recalls a memory.

As the co-creator of a healing technique that has pioneered the concept of reading and responding to information from the human energy field, this revelation directly impacts my communication with the health care practitioners that I teach around the country and the patients that I treat.

In the computer industry, this research has led to the development of a new type of memory chip.  It is not silicon based.  Since the body is about 70% water, the new computer chip utilizes a lightly refined droplet of water.  They can pour many terabytes of information into this new chip.  As you might suspect, the data is not stored in the water.  Water acts as a matrix/template to organize the data which is actually help in a field around the chip and even around the computer itself.  This give a whole new meaning to the term “cloud computing”.

It is easy to see why I am selective about the research that I rely upon to provide the truth about the world around us.  I tend to distrust the research that is funded by chemical and pharmaceutical industries, because they tend to withhold any inconvenient information from the public.  When any “expert” attempts to convince you that you need to believe what they are stating, consider that they may be quoting research that came from an impure origin or denying the existence of research that is valid and factual.

 

America and the Culture of Chemicals

Wednesday, March 1st, 2017

Recently, I observed the 40th anniversary of my chiropractic practice in Port Angeles, WA, treating the citizens of the North Olympic Peninsula longer than any other current practitioner in my profession. As the local chiropractic patriarch, so to speak, please forgive me as I look back over that time. I wish make a few personal observations about health perspectives in my practice over the past 4 decades.

Initially, I began my professional education as a student at the University of Washington
School of Pharmacy. In my short time there, I came to understand that the health concepts they taught there were not aligned with my own beliefs. I walked away from that experience convinced that I did not wish to exist in a world of chemically-induced side effects and adverse reactions.  

To be clear, I also had other objections regarding the Pharmacy School’s narrow view of natural health care and the issues of big pharma’s stated financial goals.  It seemed to me that their objectives revolved more around positive profit outcomes rather than positive patient outcomes. But those are subjects for a different article.

In this commentary, I wish to discuss the general topic of chemical use and abuse, both legal chemicals and illegal chemicals.  Since I practice in a profession that does not use chemicals as part of the healing experience, I speak from the perspective of the now-uncommon person who prefers that the injection or ingestion of chemicals be kept to a minimum.

One of my first professional experiences with chemical abuse came in the mid-1970’s, when scientists suddenly “discovered” that Valium was addictive.  You might remember the Rolling Stones song called “Mother’s Little Helper”, about the overprescribing of tranquilizers.  In 1977, there were 60 Valium dispensed for every man, woman and child in the United States.  Somebody got my 60, somebody got my wife’s 60 and somebody got my children’s 60.

I can still recall the stress in the voices of the many people I treated that year who had suddenly been “cut-off” and could no longer get their fix.  It was heartbreaking to watch.  It was an example of what I call “legal chemical abuse”.  At that time, I put the blame directly on the shoulders of the big pharmaceutical companies and their representative, who convinced the doctors that there was no harm in prescribing them.  At that point, I was feeling pretty pleased with myself for walking away from that world.

That experience was the first of many similar episodes regarding both legal and illegal chemical abuse in my home town.  I have talked with many women who were convinced by their practitioner that they needed hormone replacement therapy to avoid hot flashes or osteoporosis, only to learn later that it made them predisposed to some types of cancer.

I have watched as the vaccines have grown to a $35 billion industry, projected to reach $60 billion in 5 years with absolutely no legal consequences if it all goes wrong. This has occurred thanks to a 2011 Supreme Court ruling that stated that vaccines were “unavoidably unsafe”, therefore the 3-5% of people who reacted to them had no legal recourse if their health was permanently damaged following their inoculations.

I have watched big pharma successfully lobby to make vaccines mandatory for students entering school in California, forcing the parents of these children to make radical, life-changing decision to avoid the vaccine dragnet.  There are many conscientious parents who do not want the vaccine chemicals, known as adjuvants, injected directly into their children’s blood stream.

I have watched as the USDA and the FDA have allowed the large commercial food manufacturer to add over 12,000 “legal” chemicals to our food supply.  I have also seen them approve the use of genetically modified (GMO) food lased with pesticides and herbicides without a single human feeding study to show that they are safe.

15 years ago, I watched as a large group from the local High School Class of 2002 suddenly “disappear” from school, drawn into the poisonous world of methamphetamine.  That was a classic example of the illegal side of the culture of chemicals.  To my thinking, it is an offshoot of the idea that you can just go numb to your problems if you take the right chemical.  Currently, my town has even greater threats from meth, cocaine and other illegal chemicals.

Someone purchases each of these chemicals, making them a huge stream of revenue for the entity that manufactures them.  And, they have a vested interest in pressuring us to continue their use.

Yes, my town is a big consumer of chemicals, both legal and illegal.  

How many more chemicals can we consume before we pass the point where cancer, autism and other diseases related to chemical abuse become the norm rather than the exception?

Why is Everyone Reacting to Gluten?

Thursday, February 23rd, 2017

My local supermarket recently ran a newspaper ad stating that their bakery uses only non-GMO flour in their breads and pastries.  I found their statement to be confusing, since all flour sold in the U.S. is non-GMO.

That said, there is a huge difference between the wheat that most Americans eat now compared to the wheat we consumed 50 years ago.  The amount of confusion surrounding this issue has led me to write this detailed explanation of this important issue.

Around 1970, a new type of wheat was quietly put upon public supermarket shelves.  It was the first crop to be genetically engineered.  From that time forward, food in America would be forever changed. The general public was never told of this change; in fact, a great deal of time and money has gone into keeping these changes secret.

So, what is the difference between a food that has been genetically engineered (GM) and a food that is a genetically modified organism (GMO)?  GMO’s are the result of a process of gene-splicing from virus’ and bacteria to create new seeds. There has been a slow, methodical creep of this kind of technology into American food over the past 5 decades.  

You are no longer eating your grandfather’s wheat, corn or soy.

When I was a child, most people had never heard of of gluten intolerance.  That is because largely, it did not exist.  Today, gluten-free products are readily available and many people complain about negative reactions to wheat.  

Why has the wheat changed and how have those changes effected the digestive health of America?

As with most of the newly created problems with our food and environment, the answer is “follow the money.” Wheat was altered with the goal of increasing the yield per acre.  The plant was genetically engineered to grow shorter with a bigger diameter around the base so it would not blow over in the wind.  During harvesting, more upright plants meant a larger yield.  Therefore, it provided more money to the commercial farmer.  That in itself does not sound bad, but there were other consequences.

Changing the plant also changed the gluten.  Although it was probably an unintended consequence, the fact remained that a new grain was created.  It contained much more gliadin, a type of gluten that causes inflammation in the intestines.  A secondary problem with gliadin is that it binds to opiate receptors in the body and creates cravings for people to eat even more.  This combination of factors has contributed to a snowballing-effect of digestive issues over the past 4 decades.

Unfortunately, it does not end there.  We now have an additional problem with commercial wheat: Roundup. They recently added a new step to the harvest of the wheat: it is sprayed with Roundup/Glyphosate just before the harvest.  This is done to kill the crop so that it can be plowed-under earlier before the onset of winter.  An additional advantage to the commercial farmer is that it dries out the grain.  Good for the farmers, but again, bad for the consumer. Non GMO-wheat is still genetically engineered and unless it is organic, it is still laden with herbicides that are toxic to the human body. The Roundup/Glyphosate increase has been scientifically correlated by researchers at MIT to the increase in many diseases, including Autism and Celiac.

The good news is that organic heritage wheat is still available to the consumer.  You can purchase this from your local farmer’s market or health food store.  If supermarket chain bakeries are interested in attracting an informed health-conscience consumer, it would be more helpful to ensure that organic heritage wheat flour is used in their breads and pastries.

Frank Springob, D.C.

Physics Will Always Trump Chemistry

Tuesday, February 7th, 2017

There has been a quiet revolution growing across the country in the field of natural health care and it all began in Port Angeles, WA.

The concept was built upon the premise that the human body had an Innate Intelligence that is constantly adapting to its immediate environment, for better or for worse.  The body has a natural attraction to a wholesome, nurturing environment and is repelled by a negative or toxic environment.

A second important premise is that each body has a field of energy that surrounds it and this field can “read” the environment for the purpose of adaptation.  On some level, these two basic concepts of the human body have existed in many cultures for centuries.

The relatively new contribution is our ability to quickly communicate with the body using the “field of energy” that it is constantly emitting.  We have called the human energy field the “Morphogenic Field” or M-Field.  The name was derived based upon early work into the Morphogenic Field done by Dr. Albert Einstein and later by Dr. Royal Lee.

The process of reading the M-Field is called Morphogenic Field Technique (MFT) and I have taught it to over 3000 health care providers in more than half of the 50 states over the past 8 years.  As many have experienced, the ability to read the M-Field and respond to it can be a great tool in assisting the assessment of a person’s nutritional, herbal and other health requirements.

The procedure is not like any other in the health care realm.  Unlike modern medicine, it does not depend upon chemistry.  It depends upon physics.  The M-Field is a natural energy signature (also called resonance), emitted by the body for the purpose of reading our immediate environment so that the body make adaptations.  Since everything else in the universe also emits an energy signature, the M-Field is constantly interacting with the surrounding fields.

If the M-Field is happy with its current environment, it will expand out.  If it dislikes the environment, it will contract.  We can use this phenomenon as a tool to determine what the body likes and what it dislikes.  We call it “Energy Signature Matching”.  The idea is to let the body tell you what external energies in its surroundings are helpful to that person and which are harmful.

Communication with the Morphogenic Field of the body can be performed by a skilled health care practitioner, trained to quantify the size and balance of the human energy field. Other required skills include a knowledge of truly natural health solutions and the ability to accurately perform a modified muscle response test on the person who’s M-Field is being analyzed. The practitioner can then use the structured MFT Procedure to uncover environmental factors that are affecting the individual and respond with appropriate natural treatment.

The only stated goal of Morphogenic Field Technique is to grow and balance the human energy field.  That is all that is promised.  However, when a large (5-7 feet) and balanced M-Field exists, our experience has shown that remarkable health improvements can be achieved over time.  We have measured these changes through more traditional methods as well, such as improvement to blood tests and symptom surveys, as well as dark field microscopy.  

The MFT Procedure is a practical application of the science of quantum physics, used to identify health challenges and find health solutions.  The secret lies in maintaining a large and balanced field of energy around the body.   Rather than using blood “chemistry” to guide a “chemical intervention”, the science of physics is used to match the energy signature of the person to the energy signature of the totally natural recommendations.

For a moment, consider the use of chemistry and physics as it exists in modern healthcare.  Physics concepts are used in many of the diagnostic tools such as x-rays, MRI’s and CT scans.  However, the treatments that result are primarily chemical in nature.  Chemistry, though helpful, has built-in limitations.   

Using existing physics concepts to read energy fields has infinite possibilities.  Until a machine is created to accurately read and respond to an energy field, the MFT concept of providing information about the needs of the body through skilled natural healers is the best way to move forward.  In my opinion, the future of healthcare around the world will ultimately involve less chemistry and more physics.

Getting to Know Your Processed Food

Monday, January 30th, 2017

Nutritional expert Dr. Royal Lee once stated, “A food that is counterfeit is no different than money that is counterfeit.”  He was speaking in response to a question about processed food, where naturally occurring nutrients are removed and then synthetic chemical vitamins are added in an attempt to compensate. Wheat flour is a good example of this common practice. The wheat kernel is stripped of the nutrient-rich bran and germ, then bleached for appearance, and then “fortified” with a few vitamins and minerals. While this bleached wheat by-product leads to light fluffy cakes with a long shelf-life, the attempt to make up for the loss of nutrients by adding in synthetic vitamins does not replace the original goodness of the fresh, whole grain.

This process is equivalent to a thief robbing you at gunpoint and taking $100 of your hard-earned money.  A few minutes later, the thief repents, and returns to offer you $6 of Monopoly money.  It’s just not the same, is it?  

When natural nutrients are destroyed and synthetic chemicals are added back in, the food is labeled as fortified.  It may sound healthy, but to the human body, fortified food is not the same as whole food.

The practice of using synthetic vitamins and minerals to replace the essential nutrients removed during food processing is so common that we seldom stop to think about it anymore.  But think about it we must, since it is affecting the health of our families.  Additionally, this practice does not stop with our food. Commercial food and drug manufacturers also use synthetic chemicals in vitamin supplements and refreshments, promoting them as health-enhancing products when, in fact, they are not.

From a scientific perspective, the molecular structures of most synthetic vitamins are markedly different from those found in nature. Even though the chemical formula is the same, the shape is different.  The variations are minute, but significant. Vitamins produced in a lab from chemicals have a left rotation (called “levo“) while the other half rotate to the right.  In nature, all plant and animal-sourced vitamin molecules will rotate in the same direction.  Though some scientists will tell you that the body cannot tell the difference, imagine trying to put a left-handed glove on your right hand.  See the problem?

Additionally, in nature, all vitamins are accompanied by other related nutrients called synergists that must be present for any nutrient to be fully functional in the body.  If the synergists are missing, as with chemical vitamins, the effect on the body is more pharmaceutical than nutritional.  There is an effect, but it is often not the one that is desired. It can give us expensive greenish urine, but does not bring us better health.

Consider many of the so-called “healthy products” that are currently marketed to the American consumer.  Almost all of the vitamin supplements sold in pharmacies and big-box stores are made with synthetic chemical vitamins.  The well-known makers of the popular “energy drinks” use many of the same sources for these pseudo-vitamins in these beverages.  

Since there are only a few suppliers for the base components for these commercial products, the sources are easy to identify.  A quick internet visit to chemicalregister.com will confirm that many of these chemicals come from China.

Supplementing your diet with micro-nutrients can and often does improve health, IF the supplements are in the right form. In my nutrition-based practice, I recommend supplements that are concentrations of organic whole food.  This is a normal, natural delivery system for nutrients.  I use a supplement company that grows most of the food for their line of supplements on their own organically certified farm.  Additionally, they never process over 120 degrees, preserving the original nutrient value.  These are real supplements the way nature intended.

The Ancestral Diet and the Modern Diet

Monday, January 23rd, 2017

My hometown of Port Angeles is located approximately 15 miles from a famous archeological dig, the Manis Mastodon Site, unearthed in 1977.  According to the scientific journal “Science”, this location is the oldest human settlement the Western Hemisphere found to date.  There, tools and artifacts have been dated back to 13,800 years ago, older than the Clovis Site in New Mexico by 1000 years.  The dig at the Manis Mastodon site uncovered the remains of bison, caribou, and elk, but the nearly 14,000 year old mastodon remains the big attraction at the visitor’s center.

I recall reading about the discovery in the local newspaper when it was first publicized, trying to imagine the early humans’ relationship to this beast.  It was found with a spear point embedded in its rib, confirming for archaeologists that humans were indeed hunting in this area at that time.

I was reminded of the old joke about how to eat an elephant, which I have referred to many times in my life when faced with a large, daunting project.  Breaking things down into smaller pieces makes them manageable.

So close to my home there is an actual historical settlement where people literally “ate the elephant” for survival. Just south of Sequim, Washington, lays ample evidence of the known origins of a traditional diet in the Western Hemisphere.  

The Native American indigenous people survived many millennia before the arrival of the European settlers to “the New World.”  Tribal nations across the country consumed the food that was available to them, and it is well documented that there was an abundance of animal fat and protein in the primitive diet.  

Less obvious, perhaps, is the fact that nobody was getting their cholesterol checked on a regular basis. 14,000 years ago, people functioned without knowing their blood pressure or their resting heart rate.  Yet, they managed to survive as a culture for thousands of years.  Of course, the food was devoid of pesticides and herbicides; what today we would refer to as a totally organic diet. The carbohydrates that were consumed by early humans were in their complex form, since refined carbohydrates would not exist for another 13,400 years. 

We do a different sort of hunting now.  In the 21st Century, conscientious shoppers spend a lot of time reading the labels on the food for sale at the grocery store.  For those who are interested in health, the goal of the hunt is to find a nutrient-rich, high quality organic food supply.  Today, this type of food can seem more elusive than a mastodon.  As consumers we must decipher, from reading labels on packages, whether or not the contents are something we really want to put into our mouths.

The Native American ancestors who occupied the area 14 millennia ago had no such worries.  Whatever maladies they may have suffered as a culture, cancer was probably not one of them.  Now we live in a world where it comes as no surprise to learn that almost everything we have been eating, breathing or cleaning with is a known or possible carcinogen.  While regulatory agencies try to limit the exposure of the known carcinogens that we consume, these limits often come only after decades of exposure to the offending substance.  

Big agribusiness and the chemical industry have now introduced over 80,000 new artificial chemicals into our food supply and environment.  Much of this is done without sufficient testing to evaluate the risks of exposing the population to potential threats.  Regulatory agencies have explained that extensive safety studies are not practical; it would be too expensive and it would slow the progress of new products to the market.  

While you and I may believe that delaying the marketing of new chemicals is a great idea, it is likely that DuPont and Dow Chemical do not. Rather than proving the safety of a new product prior to introduction to the public, the product must be proven to be unsafe before it is “pulled” from the market.  In the meantime, we are all exposed to it.  This is not the recipe for another 14,000 years of survival.

 

My “Truly Affordable” Health Care Solution

Thursday, January 19th, 2017

I was recently asked to speak at an event in my town sponsored by the Democratic Party about the “crisis” of repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA), known by most as “ObamaCare”. The invitation came from a local physician, who believed that the public should have input from all sides, including that from the “alternative perspective”.

After quickly considering all of my Sunday afternoon options, I declined the invitation. While I agreed that everyone in the health care conversation would benefit from my perspective, I was pretty sure that nobody who would attend this function really wanted to hear what I had to say.

This morning, I read an article in the local newspaper about the event. The story in the paper only confirmed that my opinions about the practicality and affordability of Obamacare would have fallen on deaf ears. According to the article, everyone at the meeting agreed that repealing the ACA would be a disaster for everyone. I totally disagree. Done properly, a new system that gives coverage to every person is just what we need!

The biggest problem we have with the Affordable Care Act is that it is not really affordable. On the other hand, complete coverage could be very affordable but requires a total reconsideration of several factors that nobody wants to talk about. Surprisingly, it starts with a premise that should be near and dear to the heart of all Americans—freedom!

America is the “land of the free”, right? You do not hear that much anymore. The phrase has slowly been changed to “freedom isn’t free”. The implication is clear—we aren’t really free and we should all be OK with that. Events, like the one I did not attend, are occurring all over the country right now. These events are telling us that we have to accept the government’s right to make our decisions for us, including about our health and health care. If you don’t like the set-up, too bad. And, by the way, you have to pay for it anyway!

ObamaCare has been a disaster for the large number of people who prefer the natural health alternative. Resources are being routed into a system which they neither support or routinely participate in, except in an emergency. Paying the massive insurance premiums needed to support the current system leaves them without the financial resources needed to participate in a truly natural health care system, one that focuses upon “health” rather than on “disease”.

Contrary to the initial promises made by the advocates of the ACA, natural preventative care does not play an active role in this system. The term “preventative care” has been redefined to meet the needs of the pharmaceutical and medical lobbyists and true preventative care has been marginalized into near extinction.

As a result, most of my patients use cash to pay for their care. Plus, they also pay their ever-increasing insurance premiums. The people I treat are not seeking to get another chemical in the form of a prescription. They know that they are getting enough chemicals already from the processed GMO food products they are eating. My patients are seeking advice regarding health alternatives from nature. And I am pleased to provide them with those options. They pay out-of-pocket because our protocols are “not a covered service”.

So, what is my “Truly Affordable Health Care Solution”?

It is pretty simple—get rid of all of the expensive stuff that really doesn’t support true health, like insurance companies and government interventions.

I recommend an automatic health savings account totally directed by the person responsible for making the individual health care decisions. The account would be backed by a major medical policy that would kick-in only when the annual health expenses exceed $10,000. Each American would receive an annual health care allotment that can be used as they choose (freedom returns). If they don’t spend it, it can be rolled-over into the next year.

Everyone will be covered. Everyone becomes responsible. Freedom of choice in health care returns.

Health savings accounts have worked well in the past. The problem came from the “disease care” industry as people increasingly made natural health care choices. The insurance companies, the hospitals and the pharmaceutical industry all lost market share when people were actually empowered to make their own choices. The money flows away from them. These are the groups that do not really want the system improved.

That is why those groups need their lobbyists!

Parasite Energies

Thursday, March 12th, 2015

Acknowledging in the energy of parasites within the human body is one of the great practical applications of the M-Field procedure. Dan Riskin, biologist and narrator of the television series “Monsters Inside Me” on the Animal Planet Channel, regularly states that “Everybody has them.”  Utilizing the M-Field Technique on thousands of patients, we have come to the conclusion that this is a valid statement. If this is indeed true, why are they so seldom diagnosed within the American medical system?

A local medical doctor stated that he agreed with the opinion of Dan Riskin, but noted that parasitic infestations are usually diagnosed following a stool sample. He felt that it was possible that the lab technicians either do not know what they are looking for, or they do not know what they’re looking at.

In my many years of doing muscle response testing procedures prior to the development of Morphogenic Field Technique, it was uncommon to find parasite energies using old testing procedures. When they did show up, they were usually found after several weeks or months of treatment. Once revealed, the patient’s symptoms usually improved rapidly.

With this in mind, we determined that in the development of the M-Field procedures, we would focus on layering energies in our test kits with a focus on uncovering hidden parasite energies within the body. After many months of experimenting with different types of layered energies, we accomplished this intended purpose. It is this capability and the use of the M-Field that has created many of our huge clinical successes. Both Chantea’s Story and Lexi’s Story in the book, Bugs in My Brain, Poison on My Plate tell of radical symptomatic improvement once these parasitic energies, which we call detrimentals, are handled with our nutritional and herbal protocols.

But first, the parasite energies must be acknowledged. The ability to find hidden parasite energies within the body with the Morphogenic Field Technique and the resulting symptomatic improvement for the patient has been extremely gratifying.

M-Field Signature Matching®

Thursday, January 15th, 2015

What does it mean to match the energy signature of your body to the energy signature of your food?

The science of quantum physics exists to explain the phenomena of the smallest pieces of structure known to man. At the core of all structure is energy. The human body consists of many “systems” of physiological function such as the digestive system, the nervous system, the circulatory system, etc. Each of these systems is made up of organs. Organs are made up of tissues, which are made up of cells. If you go even smaller, you discover molecules, atoms and sub-atomic particles, which are comprised of packets of energy wholeness known as the quantum.

Energy Signatures

Each level of matter and each level of life has an “energy signature” that is unique. Your personal energy signature is the sum of all of the trillions of energy signatures that go into your makeup. Your energy signature is greatly influenced by your immediate environment—what you eat, your level of emotional stress, toxins that have entered your system and hundreds of other factors including your genetic make-up. In other words, your energy signature today is different from what it was last year, last week and even yesterday. It varies based upon your diet, sleep, stress and toxic exposure.

Your energy is represented by a field that constantly surrounds your body in a recognizable pattern call the “torus”. In our work, we call this the Morphogenic Field or M-Field. In a healthy person, it is a large and balanced field that radiates off the body to approximately 5-7 feet, based upon the MFT method of measurement. People with a large M-field are usually healthy, vibrant individuals. People with a small or distorted M-Field usually have some level of health challenge and are lacking in personal energy.

This torus pattern is found consistently in all scales of matter, from the atom to humans, to planets and even galaxies. Food also has an energy signature. The same torus pattern can be seen in the cross section of an apple or an orange. In MFT, we consider the torus to represent the energy signature of the atom, the fruit, the human or the planet. We use this, in combination with the science of muscle response testing, to match-up the energy signature of food with the energy signature of the person.

The food is presented to a person’s energy field with the intention of learning whether or not the food is an M-Field Signature Match to that person. If it matches, the food can be considered acceptable to that person. It the body rejects the food, we conclude that this food will not provide the body with the nutrients that it needs at that given time. We contend that “matched food” is nourishing to the body and “mismatched food” is a hindrance to that person’s health and wellbeing.

Our purpose in presenting this concept is to educate and empower people to seek food sources that will expand their M-Field and thus become healthier and more vibrant. If consumers seek food that nourishes and fuels the body, it goes a long way toward developing a supply-and-demand situation where the people who grow our food will move away from their current trend of degrading our food supply with processed and genetically engineered products.

M-Field Signature Matching consistently reveals that only the energy of organic whole food truly matches the energy signature of the body. This system is offered at 4-hour seminars throughout the country at regular intervals. For information regarding these classes, visit seminars.

Overriding Noonan’s and Lupus

Thursday, July 24th, 2014

A 36-year-old woman diagnosed with Lupus and Noonan’s Syndrome was pregnant with her third child. Former pregnancies resulted in both children not breathing at birth.

One child spent seven weeks at in the hospital due to brain swelling and has shunt to drain the brain. The child has had multiple seizures and brain surgeries since birth. Second child spent two weeks in the hospital. Both children have the classic concaved chest, short stature, speech impediment, rounded face, dropped ears, poor muscle tone, high palate, difficulty digesting, learning disabilities, and a higher than normal voice.

The mother was concerned about being pregnant with the third child due to the hereditary factors. Mother is suspected to have a genetic break in MTHFR considering her very pale skin, dark circles under the eyes, low weight, poor digestion, and large bald spots from the Lupus. The mother was very malnourished and rightly concerned about baby’s health based on my observations.

The mother was on more than normal amounts of nutrition throughout the entire pregnancy, and I saw her weekly through the entire pregnancy utilizing advanced Morphogenic Field Technique training.  I focused my attention on reading the baby and mother, separately.  Due to the genetic break with Noonan’s, the mother was put on Folic Acid B12 to start. Through M-Field testing, the first three weeks of pregnancy showed the need for Cod Liver Oil, Cal Sol, and Catalyn. By 9-12 weeks of pregnancy, the baby tested for Cod Liver Oil, Tuna Omega Oil and Trace Minerals B12.

By second trimester, mother was having difficulty detoxifying and immune system was not functioning at optimal levels. Immuplex, Bio GGG-B (Biotics), Super EFF, AF Betafood and Zypan were added. By the end of second trimester the liver and kidneys showed signs of insufficiency, Livaplex and Albaplex were added to aid in the detoxification processes.

In the third trimester a cardio scan was performed on the baby due to congenital heart defects known with Noonan’s.  The ultrasound showed an underdeveloped valve in the baby’s heart. Utilizing the Morphogenic Field Technique, I used the Heart Vial to test baby. Baby showed the initial need of eleven RNA and four L-Carnitine.  A week later the count decreased to 5 RNA.  In the following weeks the baby tested for Cataplex G, RNA, L-Carnitine, Cod Liver Oil and Ferrofood.  The final week of pregnancy baby tested for Cataplex G (3),  Zypan (3), Ferrofood (2), Cod Liver Oil (5), Calcium Lactate (6), Trace Minderals B12 (3), L-Carnitine (2).

For the first time in this mother’s life, she was not only able hold her baby after birth, but to also hear her child cry.  The mother had never experienced the blessing of having her child sleep with her after birth, nor be in the bassinet next to her after birth. Needless to say there was not a dry eye in the room when the baby was born, including the doctors.

The grandmother later revealed to me that it is next to impossible to override the chromosome defect in her daughter. The genetic break of Noonan’s comes from the grandmother’s side of the family.  Using the M-field, we made the impossible happen.

Mother and daughter are doing very well. The doctors continue to monitor the infant’s heart. Some of the symptoms of Noonan’s are present in the child, but not in the advanced ways as her siblings. It appears that this child will grow up with minimal health complications.

MORPHOGENIC FIELD TECHNIQUE
Port Angeles, Washington